Who Got the Akomoje-Mawuko Road Contract? DLA Demands Disclosure From Senator

The Democratic Leadership Alliance, DLA, has given a seven-day ultimatum to the senator representing Ogun Central Senatorial District to explain issues surrounding the Akomoje-Mawuko road contract.

It threatens legal action if the questions are not satisfactorily addressed. The demand, places the road project under fresh public scrutiny and raises questions about the contract process, project financing and the senator’s role in facilitating the project.

The DLA’s position is that the senator should provide clarification within seven days or be prepared to face legal proceedings.

ValidViewNetwork reports that the controversy comes as Ogun State’s politicians increasingly face public scrutiny over constituency projects and claims of federal interventions ahead of the 2027 elections.

WHAT THE ROAD PROJECT INVOLVES

The Akomoje-Mawuko-Opeji Road has been publicly identified as one of the infrastructure projects associated with Senator Shuaib Afolabi Salisu, who represents Ogun Central in the Senate.

In accounts of his constituency interventions, Salisu has listed the construction of the Akomoje-Mawuko-Opeji Road among projects facilitated in Ogun Central.

Another account described the project as part of his infrastructure interventions in the senatorial district.

The road is located within the wider Abeokuta axis of Ogun Central, an area comprising communities whose residents depend heavily on road infrastructure for movement, trade and access to public services.

The senator’s public record of constituency projects also includes the rehabilitation of the Camp-FUNAAB-Alabata Road, transformers, solar-powered boreholes and solar streetlights across parts of Ogun Central.

DLA’S SEVEN-DAY ULTIMATUM

According to the Salient Times report, the DLA wants the senator to provide explanations concerning the Akomoje-Mawuko road contract.

The group has reportedly threatened to take legal action if the senator fails to respond within the stipulated seven-day period.

The demand effectively shifts the matter from political debate to a question of documentation and accountability. At the centre of the dispute is the need to establish, from official records, the precise nature of the contract, the procuring authority, the contractor, the contract value, the funding source, the scope of work and the senator’s formal connection to the project.

Those details are important because constituency projects facilitated by federal lawmakers can involve different Ministries, Departments and Agencies, depending on the source and nature of the intervention.

OFFICIAL RECORDS AND THE CONTRACT QUESTION

Ogun State maintains an electronic procurement portal containing information on government contracts, including project titles, contractors, contract sums and other procurement details.

The portal shows that Ogun’s procurement records include major road projects and other infrastructure works. Although the records reviewed do not by themselves establish the specific allegations raised by the DLA concerning the Akomoje-Mawuko project.

ADVERTISEMENT

That distinction is important. A demand for explanation is not, by itself, proof that a contract was improperly awarded or administered.

Any allegation of wrongdoing would require supporting documentary evidence and, where appropriate, findings by a competent authority.

The DLA’s challenge therefore provides an opportunity for the senator and relevant government agencies to place the contract documents and implementation details in the public domain.

SENATOR SALISU’S ACCOUNT OF THE PROJECT

Salisu has previously identified road infrastructure as one of the areas of his representation in Ogun Central.

Reports on his constituency activities list the Camp-FUNAAB-Alabata Road rehabilitation and construction of the Akomoje-Mawuko-Opeji Road among the infrastructure projects he has highlighted.

In another account of his constituency activities, the project was described as Phase One of the Arakanga-Mawuko Road, with the senator saying the road had reportedly remained abandoned for more than three decades before the intervention.

The difference in the naming of the road in public accounts makes access to the original project documents particularly important.

WHY THE DOCUMENTS MATTER

For the controversy to be resolved, the relevant documents would need to answer basic questions. Who awarded the contract? Who is the contractor? What is the contract value? When was the contract awarded? What was the original scope of work? Where did the funding come from? What percentage of the project has been completed? What payments, if any, have been made? What role did the senator play in initiating or facilitating the project?

These are factual questions that can be answered through procurement records, budget documents, project monitoring reports and statements from the relevant government agencies.

POLITICAL CONTEXT

The controversy comes at a politically significant period in Ogun State, with Senator Salisu’s colleague, Senator Solomon Olamilekan Adeola, serving as the All Progressives Congress governorship candidate ahead of the 2027 election.

Current reporting places infrastructure and constituency development among the issues being discussed by Ogun politicians as the state moves towards the election season.

The DLA itself is among the political parties participating in Nigeria’s 2027 electoral process.

ValidViewNetwork reports that the DLA is one of the 22 political parties recognised by INEC for the 2027 elections.

That political context does not establish the truth or otherwise of the DLA’s allegations. It does, however, make documentary transparency particularly relevant whenever public funds, constituency projects and elected officials are involved.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

The seven-day deadline issued by the DLA now places attention on whether Senator Salisu will respond to the questions and whether the relevant contract documents will be made available.

If the matter proceeds to court, the allegations would become subject to judicial scrutiny and the parties would have an opportunity to present documentary evidence and their respective arguments.

For now, the DLA’s allegations remain allegations. ValidViewNetwork will continue to distinguish between claims made by political actors and facts established through official records, investigations or competent authorities.