At approximately 1:25 a.m. on October 14, 2026, a nurse on night duty at the Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital (OOUTH), Sagamu, was strangled and slapped repeatedly by the relatives of a patient who had just died on the children’s ward.
She bled from her nose. She began to lose consciousness.
The security personnel she and a colleague ran to for help did not respond.
And when the dust settled, sources say the hospital’s Chief Medical Director moved not to protect the nurse, but to contain the scandal.
This is the story of what happened at OOUTH, reconstructed from a formal incident report obtained by ValidViewNetwork, as well as from multiple internal verified sources within the hospital.
ValidViewNetwork also got information about the incident from direct accounts of staff who witnessed the assault and its aftermath.
This is the story of a nurse who was assaulted while doing her job, of a security system that failed, and of an institution that staff say is more interested in protecting its reputation than its people.
THE PATIENT WHO DIED
The patient at the centre of the incident was a child with end-stage neuroblastoma, a cancer that had already progressed beyond curative treatment.
According to the incident report, the attending medical team had been informed of the patient’s deteriorating condition, and a request had been made for referral to another hospital for further management.
That referral was not carried out.
The family was poor. The child’s condition was deteriorating. And the relatives had been making threats.
“The patient’s relative is very poor and the condition was deteriorating already,” the report states. “The nurse informed the consultant in charge, but they said they cannot refer because they’re already in a teaching hospital. Before the child eventually passed on, the relative had been making comments saying they’re going to cause chaos if anything happens to their child.”
Despite the challenging clinical circumstances and the limited treatment options available for a patient with end-stage disease, the nursing team continued to provide care and made efforts to manage the patient’s condition within available capacity.
THE NIGHT SHIFT FROM HELL
On the night of October 14, 2026, the children’s ward at OOUTH was operating with only two nurses on duty.
That same night, two patients experienced cardiac arrests, requiring immediate resuscitation. The two nurses had to divide their attention and work separately to attend to both emergencies in an attempt to save their lives.
While the nurses were occupied with these emergencies, the relative of the patient who had died physically assaulted one of the nurses.
The details are harrowing.
According to the incident report, the nurse was strangled and slapped repeatedly, resulting in significant pain and distress.
A colleague who witnessed the assault immediately ran to call hospital security personnel. None of them responded.
“Upon witnessing the assault, I immediately ran to call the hospital security personnel for assistance. Unfortunately, none of the security personnel I approached responded to my call for help,” the report states.
The nurse had reportedly sought help earlier, when the child died, she informed the security officers at the ward area. They told her to go and meet those at the main gate of the hospital, which is very far from the ward.
She was left alone.
“THEY BEAT HER TO THE POINT THAT SHE BLED FROM HER NOSE”
The assault was brutal.
“They beat her to the point that she bled from her nose,” a source within the hospital told ValidViewNetwork.
Sources said the relatives called for backup, and they came in their numbers. The nurse was strangled, slapped, and beaten.
“I started having syncope before the doctors were able to restrain her,” the victim said.
The nurse’s name is Nurse Adeeko. The only witness who has been publicly identified is Nurse Lasisi, the treasurer of the National Association of Nigerian Nurses and Midwives (NANNM).
Nurse Adeeko, in her own words, described her condition after the attack: “Good morning everyone, thank you so much for your concern, I’m really grateful. I made a huge mistake of not taking a picture of my face when the incident occurred. My face is much better now because I applied a cold compress all through the night, so the swelling has gone down and is no longer visible. The pinkish color and redness have also gone down due to the cold compress. So I don’t really have evidence now. The only witness is one nurse, Nurse Lasisi, the treasurer for NANNM.”
The absence of photographs does not mean the assault did not happen. It means a nurse who had just been strangled and slapped was not thinking about evidence.
She was thinking about survival.
Her face was swollen, pinkish and red. She applied cold compresses all night. By morning, the visible evidence had faded, but the memory of being strangled had not.
THE THREATS RETURNED
The assault was not the end of the ordeal.
At approximately 1:25 a.m., the patient’s relatives reportedly returned to the ward and began threatening the nursing staff again.
“This further heightened the fear and emotional distress experienced by the nurses, particularly given the earlier physical assault and the failure of the security personnel to respond promptly when assistance was initially requested,” the report states.”
The recurrence of threats within the same night raised serious concerns about the safety and protection of healthcare workers within the hospital premises.
“The nurses were left terrified. They had been carrying out their professional responsibilities, attending to two critically ill patients, and one of them was almost killed by a grieving relative.
THE FAILURE OF SECURITY
The failure of security personnel to respond is one of the most damning aspects of this incident.
The colleague ran to call security.
No one responded. The nurse had earlier informed ward security. They told her to walk to the main gate. No one came.
The incident report describes this as a “failure of immediate security response” and recommends “an investigation into the failure of security personnel to respond when assistance was requested.”
But the failure was not merely operational. It was systemic. The supervisor on duty was contacted, who subsequently contacted the police for intervention. The police came, but by then, the damage had been done.
THE VICTIM’S ORDEAL
Nurse Adeeko was left with physical pain and emotional distress.
“She has been experiencing significant physical pain and emotional distress following the incident,” the report states.
The colleague who witnessed the situation and attempted to obtain security assistance was also deeply affected and remained emotionally distressed.
The incident has raised serious concerns regarding the safety of nurses on duty, especially when attending to emergencies with limited personnel and inadequate immediate security support.
THE COVER-UP ALLEGATIONS
What happened next, according to staff, is where the hospital’s management becomes part of the problem.
Hospital management instructed the nursing staff to resume their duties.
The affected nurses refused.
They said the assault, the threats, and the failure of security meant the conditions were unsafe.
A meeting was held. A protest followed on the morning of October 15, 2026.
“This morning, a meeting has been done, a protest is currently ongoing, but it doesn’t seem like they’re headed anywhere,” a source within the hospital told ValidViewNetwork.
“I can hear them saying that the CMD said they should beg us instead, which is totally unacceptable.”
The CMD — Chief Medical Director, has been accused of attempting to prevent the case from leaking.
“Fear of the CMD who is doing everything to prevent the case from leaking out,” the source said.”
They are all stopping her from communicating with anybody. She’s currently in the A&E department, and our CNOs and ADNS are shielding her.
“The ADNS — Assistant Director of Nursing Services, reportedly went to borrow a nurse from another ward to continue working in place of the assaulted nurse.”
The CMD was also accused of previously debunking a similar report on X (formerly Twitter), stating that it wasn’t true, despite staff insisting that there are two nurses in each shift managing 15 to 20 patients.
“This same OOUTH trended last month or so on Twitter, and the CMD debunked it, putting out a statement that it wasn’t true. Whereas there are two nurses in each shift managing 15–20 patients,” the source said.
“NOBODY GREE SIGN, OPPRESSION EVERYWHERE”
The internal communications reveal a climate of fear and intimidation at OOUTH.
“Nobody gree sign, oppression everywhere,” the source said.
“How can they stop me from communicating with people? This is why I said every nurse should have a lawyer!” she continued.
Staff have been prevented from communicating freely about the incident. The victim is reportedly being shielded by nursing leaders.
“A Nurse was assaulted at OOUTH, and the CMD instructed nursing leaders to ensure cover-up. Someone who was strangled? They will kill a Nurse one day, and they will cover up. I have always known that CMD to be evil and mentally unstable,” the source said.
THE PROTEST
Despite attempts to suppress the incident, the nurses protested. The protest was motivated by the need for accountability, adequate protection, and assurance that similar incidents would not be allowed to recur.
Gen Z nurses (the younger cohort of nurses currently working in Nigerian hospitals, typically those in their twenties and early thirties) were said to have spearheaded the movement.
“They are all stopping her from communicating with anybody,” the source said. “Gen Z nurses are working in the hospital. They spearheaded the movement first.”
The protest was ongoing as of Thursday morning.
THE STRUCTURAL CRISIS: TWO NURSES, FIFTEEN TO TWENTY PATIENTS
The assault did not occur in isolation. It occurred in a hospital where, according to staff, two nurses are routinely expected to manage 15 to 20 patients per shift.
That ratio is not merely inadequate. It is dangerous.
When two nurses are responsible for 15 to 20 patients, and two of those patients experience cardiac arrests simultaneously, the nurses must divide themselves.
They cannot be in two places at once. They cannot provide the level of attention that critically ill patients require.
The incident report identifies this as a key concern: “Staffing and emergency response challenges: Two nurses had to attend to two separate cardiac arrest emergencies simultaneously.”
The report recommends “a review of staffing arrangements and emergency response protocols to ensure that critically ill patients receive timely attention without exposing nurses to avoidable risks.”
Do you want to advertise with us?
Do you need publicity for a product, service, or event?
Contact us on WhatsApp +2348033617468, +234 816 612 1513, +234 703 010 7174
or Email: validviewnetwork@gmail.com
CLICK TO JOIN OUR WHATSAPP GROUP
But the staffing crisis is not new. It is a chronic condition that has been raised repeatedly, and dismissed repeatedly.
THE CLINICAL ESCALATION CONCERNS
The incident also raises questions about clinical escalation and referral procedures.
The patient had end-stage neuroblastoma. The nurse informed the consultant in charge. The consultant said the patient could not be referred because they were already in a teaching hospital.
Was that the right clinical decision?
The incident report does not answer that question. But it recommends “a review of the clinical escalation and referral concerns raised before the patient’s death, based on the relevant medical records and established hospital procedures.”
The death of a child is a tragedy. It is also a moment of immense emotional volatility.
Families in grief can act irrationally.
But grief cannot justify assault. And clinical decisions, however difficult, must be reviewed to ensure that lessons are learned.
THE FORMAL DEMANDS
The incident report contains ten specific recommendations and demands:
1. A formal and impartial investigation into the assault and subsequent threats against the nurse.
2. Appropriate action in accordance with hospital policy and applicable law against anyone found responsible for the assault and threats.
3. An investigation into the failure of security personnel to respond when assistance was requested.
4. Immediate measures to guarantee the safety of the assaulted nurse and all other staff members, including protection against further threats or retaliation.
5. Adequate and responsive security coverage, particularly during night shifts and emergency situations.
6. A review of staffing arrangements and emergency response protocols to ensure that critically ill patients receive timely attention without exposing nurses to avoidable risks.
7. A review of the clinical escalation and referral concerns raised before the patient’s death, based on the relevant medical records and established hospital procedures.
8. Appropriate medical assessment, treatment, documentation, and psychological support for the assaulted nurse.
9. A clear written assurance from hospital management that effective measures will be implemented to protect healthcare workers from violence and intimidation.
10. Constructive engagement between management and nursing staff to address the concerns raised and establish safe conditions for the resumption of duties.
The incident report concludes with a statement that captures the essence of the crisis: “The incident of 14th October 2026 was deeply distressing and raises serious concerns about the safety of nurses and the adequacy of security arrangements within OOUTH, Sagamu.”
The nursing staff made efforts to provide care to a critically ill patient while also responding to two cardiac arrest emergencies.
The death of a patient, particularly one with an advanced and life-threatening illness, is a painful event; however, grief and frustration cannot justify the physical assault or intimidation of healthcare workers.
“No nurse should have to choose between responding to a medical emergency and protecting herself from violence. Equally, no nurse should be left without timely security assistance when her safety is threatened.”
ValidViewNetwork therefore call on the hospital management to treat this matter with the urgency and seriousness it deserves, ensure a thorough investigation, provide appropriate support to the affected nurse, and implement effective measures to guarantee the safety and dignity of all healthcare workers.
WHY IT MATTERS
The assault on Nurse Adeeko is not an isolated incident. It is a symptom of a broken system.
Healthcare workers across Nigeria face violence, threats and intimidation in the course of their duties. They are assaulted by patients’ relatives, threatened by grieving families, and left unprotected by security systems that do not respond.
At OOUTH, the situation is compounded by allegations of a management that prioritises reputation over staff welfare.
The nurses who protested did so because they had no other option. They had been assaulted, threatened, and told to return to work as if nothing had happened. Their colleague had bled from her nose. Their security had failed them.
And their leadership, they say, was more interested in containing the scandal than protecting them.The nurses are demanding accountability. They are demanding safety. They are demanding that no nurse should ever have to choose between saving a patient and saving herself.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
As of Thursday, the protest was ongoing. The CMD had not responded publicly to the allegations.
Nurse Adeeko was in the A&E department. The questions are many. Who assaulted the nurse? Will they be held accountable? Why did security fail?
And why is the management allegedly trying to silence the victim?
For now, the nurses of OOUTH are demanding answers. They have said they will not return to work until their safety is guaranteed.
ValidViewNetwork will continue to follow this story.