AIYEKOOTO : The Government Hilux and Five Dead : Who Owns the Road when Power is on the Move?

Nigeria’s public roads are not private driveways for the powerful, and a government vehicle is not a mobile declaration that everybody else must get out of the way, whatever the consequences. Yet the fatal collision involving a Government House vehicle in Niger State, which claimed the lives of four students of the Federal University of Technology, Minna, and the government driver, has reopened a question this country has postponed for too long: when a vehicle belonging to the machinery of government collides with ordinary citizens and lives are lost, does public authority guarantee accountability, or merely command the first press statement?

The collision occurred on Monday, 26 October, along the Minna to Bida road. The vehicle, a Toyota Hilux conveying Government House Director-General Dauda Chikuba, collided head-on with a car carrying the students. Four students and the Hilux driver died. Chikuba survived with injuries and was taken to hospital. Eyewitness accounts alleged excessive speed and wrongful manoeuvring, while the police confirmed that an investigation had commenced.

The Niger State Government subsequently disputed the description of the vehicle as being on an assignment with Governor Mohammed Umaru Bago’s convoy. Its Commissioner for Information, Obed Nana, said the driver was returning from a trip with other government staff. But the same statement disclosed that preliminary information available to the government indicated that the driver had acted recklessly.

ADVERTISEMENT

That admission deserves attention. If the government itself says preliminary information points to reckless driving, why should the public be expected to settle for condolences and general appeals to motorists to obey traffic regulations? What exactly happened, and what consequences will follow when the investigation is concluded?

The dead students were not intruders on a government road. They were travelling on a public highway, pursuing their lives and ambitions. Their families had every reason to expect that a routine journey would end with their safe arrival, not a telephone call announcing that their children would never return home. The Government House driver also died. His death, too, deserves an honest investigation. Accountability must not become an excuse for prejudging a dead man who cannot offer his own account.

Here lies the familiar Nigerian problem. When an ordinary motorist causes a fatal crash, the law is expected to take its course. When a vehicle belonging to a powerful institution is involved, the public suddenly encounters a maze of distinctions: whether the governor was in the vehicle, whether it was in the main convoy formation, whether the official being transported was the principal passenger, or whether the driver was on a separate assignment.

Some of these distinctions may be relevant to establishing the precise circumstances of the journey. None answers the central question of responsibility.

Governor Bago need not have been behind the wheel for the public to demand an account of the standards governing vehicles attached to his administration. Equally, the Government House connection does not establish that the governor personally caused the collision. Responsibility must follow evidence, not proximity to power. But a government cannot distance itself from an official vehicle merely by disputing its place in a convoy formation. The vehicle, its assignment, its occupants and the circumstances of its movement remain matters requiring explanation.

Let us address the larger culture. Across Nigeria, some official convoys behave as though flashing lights, sirens and security escorts confer a superior right to public space. Other road users are expected to scatter, brake suddenly or abandon their lanes because somebody important is passing. That is not security. It is privilege performing a dangerous pantomime on a public highway.

An escort cannot suspend the laws of physics. A siren cannot restore a life destroyed by a collision. An official vehicle cannot acquire immunity from traffic regulations because it carries a government functionary. If anything, the greater the authority attached to a vehicle, the greater the responsibility to ensure that its movement does not endanger other road users.

There is also an irony too painful to ignore. Reports say the governor and his entourage were returning from a condolence visit to the Etsu Nupe following a death in the royal family. A journey associated with commiseration ended in another household’s grief. The irony does not establish culpability, but it underlines the human cost of a road culture in which the safe arrival of the powerful can appear more urgent than the safety of everybody else.

What happens now will matter more than the customary expressions of sympathy. The Niger State Police Command must establish the circumstances of the collision and make its findings available in accordance with the law. The Federal Road Safety Corps should provide its relevant findings. The state government must preserve records relating to the vehicle, its ownership, assignment, journey, occupants and operational instructions, and cooperate fully with the investigation.

If the evidence establishes dangerous driving or another criminal offence, the responsible person must face the applicable legal process. If there were failures in vehicle supervision, driver management or official travel procedures, those failures must also be identified and addressed. Nobody should be convicted by newspaper headline, but neither should anybody be shielded by institutional position.

The families deserve more than condolences. The government should maintain direct contact with them, provide appropriate support and address any lawful claims arising from the deaths. FUT Minna should ensure that the victims’ identities and academic circumstances are properly acknowledged. Any scholarship or memorial initiative would be welcome, but it must complement accountability, not become a substitute for it.

The government must also review the operating procedures for official vehicles and convoys: driver training, speed discipline, journey planning, escort conduct and compliance with road safety requirements. The review should not be confined to Niger State if it exposes practices common across the country. Public roads belong to the public, and the rules must mean the same thing whether the vehicle carries a student, a trader, a civil servant or a governor’s aide.

A government that demands obedience to the law must demonstrate obedience to it. That is the difference between authority and entitlement.

The five people who died cannot be brought back by an inquiry, a prosecution or a new vehicle protocol. But their deaths must not be reduced to another brief season of outrage followed by official silence. The test is whether the investigation establishes the truth, whether the evidence produces the appropriate consequences, and whether official vehicles are made safer for everyone who shares the road.

A public highway is not a royal procession ground. A siren is not a crown, and the road is not a throne. Nobody’s office grants the right to place other people’s lives at unnecessary risk.

Lanre Ogundipe, Public Affairs Analyst, Former President Nigeria and Africa Union of Journalists, writes from Abuja.